Carbon dating assumptions
Keep in mind that as early as 1779 French scientist Comte de Buffon wrote the book “Epochs of Nature” using the rock layers and fossils as rationalization for long ages.
So the idea of an old earth and universe were here long before radiometric dating had “proved” anything.
Problems with Carbon 14 dating method Known dates are wrong so old dates must also be wrong.
Carbon dating assigns ages to once-living materials such as wood, bone, teeth, and shells.
As the total amount of carbon 14 decreases over time the remaining carbon 14 can be used to estimate how long the specimen died.
Carbon 14 stabilizes quickly and thus has a short decay cycle.
Carbon 14 found in supposed ancient specimens Many materials presumed to be as old (or even older than many dinosaurs) are rich in Carbon 14 thus giving dates of only thousands of years and not millions of years.
In fact, diamonds, coal, petroleum, coral, petrified wood, and oceanic fossils such as ammonites all have Carbon 14.
Older samples such as fossils or ice age relics must be dated using assumptions because the original conditions and rates of decay are unknown.
In fact, labs that run radiometric analysis ask the scientist providing the sample to estimate the date range they assume the sample to be. Not sure if you have noticed but every decade or so the presumed age of the universe continues to get older and older.
Some of the newest numbers from string theorist have moved the 13.8-Billion-year needle to some 15 to 20 billion years.
Samples are processed through equipment called a Spectrometer.
This equipment separates and counts each radioactive element in a given sample.
Search for carbon dating assumptions:
Unknown because clearly these events occurred long before the scientist was even born, and therefore, assumptions must be made to date old samples from an unobserved past.